React Native Development

WAYF is a React Native Development Agency

WAYF is a React Native Development Agency

One codebase. Two platforms. The same senior engineers who build your web applications.
React Native isn't a separate team at WAYF. It's the same engineers, the same standards, the same product thinking – applied to mobile. The mental model carries over. The quality does too.

What We Build

Cross-platform mobile applications. Consumer apps that need to feel native. Internal tools that need to ship fast. MVPs that test a market before committing to platform-specific development.

We've built greenfield apps from scratch and integrated React Native into existing native codebases. We've shipped to both app stores simultaneously and maintained apps through years of OS updates, library changes, and evolving user expectations. The scope changes; the standard doesn't.

What we build less of: apps that genuinely need native performance throughout—heavy 3D, complex animations, deep hardware integration. We'll tell you when React Native isn't the right choice. We'd rather lose the project than build something that fights the platform.

Why Us

Same Team, Shared Expertise.

Our React Native engineers are our React engineers. They understand the component model, the state management patterns, the architectural decisions—because they've been making them on the web for years. You're not paying for a mobile team to learn React; you're paying for React experts who also ship mobile.

Same Team, Shared Expertise.

Our React Native engineers are our React engineers. They understand the component model, the state management patterns, the architectural decisions—because they've been making them on the web for years. You're not paying for a mobile team to learn React; you're paying for React experts who also ship mobile.

Seniority as Default.

Our engineers average 10+ years in software. They've shipped React Native apps that succeeded and inherited ones that struggled. They know where the framework shines and where it requires careful handling.

Seniority as Default.

Our engineers average 10+ years in software. They've shipped React Native apps that succeeded and inherited ones that struggled. They know where the framework shines and where it requires careful handling.

Honest Assessment.

React Native is a tradeoff. Cross-platform efficiency in exchange for some native capability. We'll tell you upfront whether that tradeoff makes sense for your app, your users, and your team. Some projects belong in React Native. Some don't. We help you figure out which before you've spent six months learning the hard way.

Honest Assessment.

React Native is a tradeoff. Cross-platform efficiency in exchange for some native capability. We'll tell you upfront whether that tradeoff makes sense for your app, your users, and your team. Some projects belong in React Native. Some don't. We help you figure out which before you've spent six months learning the hard way.

Range.

We've shipped for early-stage startups (Framer, Rye), global manufacturers (Ingersoll Rand), and international institutions (Council of Europe Development Bank). A consumer MVP and an enterprise mobile deployment require different approaches to testing, distribution, and long-term maintenance. We know how to navigate both.

Range.

We've shipped for early-stage startups (Framer, Rye), global manufacturers (Ingersoll Rand), and international institutions (Council of Europe Development Bank). A consumer MVP and an enterprise mobile deployment require different approaches to testing, distribution, and long-term maintenance. We know how to navigate both.

How We Work

Two modes, depending on what you need.

Sometimes you have a team, a process, and a rhythm—you need specialists who can plug in and elevate what's already working. We do that. Your tools, your ceremonies, your preferences. We adapt, and we'll point out where things could be sharper—but the mode is integration, not takeover.

But often, especially with earlier-stage companies or new product initiatives, you need more than hands. You need someone to own the process end-to-end. Set the standard. Make the calls. Tell you what's working and what isn't.

When we lead, we actually lead. That means a clear rhythm: two-week sprints, weekly syncs, monthly reviews that look forward as much as back. Decisions documented in writing so you always know why something was built a certain way. We bring the tools—Linear for tracking, Slack for daily pulse, Notion or Confluence for documentation built to last—but more importantly, we bring the discipline to use them well.

We don't wait for you to ask the right questions. We surface risks before they become problems. We tell you when scope is creeping, when a feature isn't worth the effort, when the timeline is slipping and what to do about it. You get a team that operates like founders—accountable for outcomes, not just output.

What stays constant either way: direct communication, no surprises, and feedback that's honest even when it's uncomfortable. We'd rather have a hard conversation in week two than a failed project in month six.

What We See Go Wrong

The most common pattern: teams choose React Native because "we already know React," then underestimate how different mobile is. Navigation, gestures, performance constraints, app store review processes, platform-specific behaviors—the React knowledge helps, but mobile has its own complexity.

We also see the opposite: teams that over-engineer for native parity. Building custom native modules for everything, fighting the framework instead of working with it, ending up with a codebase that's harder to maintain than two native apps would have been.

Another pattern: the "we'll just share code with web" assumption. React Native and React share concepts, not components. Teams that expect to copy-paste their web app into mobile learn this painfully. The mental model transfers; the code mostly doesn't.

We're not here to judge how you got here. Sometimes the original decision was right and circumstances changed. Sometimes it was wrong but made sense at the time. We come in as partners—assess what exists, understand the constraints, figure out whether to fix, rebuild, or occasionally recommend a different approach entirely.

Technical Approach

Performance Requires Intention

React Native can be fast—but not automatically. We profile on real devices, not simulators. We understand the bridge, where it bottlenecks, and how the new architecture changes the equation. We use native modules when JavaScript genuinely can't keep up, not as a first resort.

Navigation Matters More Than You'd Expect

We've settled on React Navigation for most projects—mature, well-maintained, handles the edge cases. But we've also worked with native navigation when app structure demanded it. The choice depends on your app's complexity and how native it needs to feel.

Navigation Matters More Than You'd Expect

We've settled on React Navigation for most projects—mature, well-maintained, handles the edge cases. But we've also worked with native navigation when app structure demanded it. The choice depends on your app's complexity and how native it needs to feel.

State Management Stays Consistent with Our Web Approach

Simple apps get simple solutions. Complex apps get the architecture they need. We don't reach for heavy tooling out of habit, but we don't avoid it out of principle either.

Expo vs. Bare Workflow—We Use Both

Expo accelerates development significantly when your app fits within its capabilities. Bare workflow when you need native modules Expo doesn't support or tighter control over the native layer. We'll recommend based on your actual requirements, not ideology.

Expo vs. Bare Workflow—
We Use Both

Expo accelerates development significantly when your app fits within its capabilities. Bare workflow when you need native modules Expo doesn't support or tighter control over the native layer. We'll recommend based on your actual requirements, not ideology.

Testing on Mobile is Different

Unit tests for logic, component tests for UI, but real confidence comes from testing on real devices across OS versions. We build testing into the workflow from the start, not as an afterthought.

Updates and Distribution are Part of The Architecture

Over-the-air updates for JavaScript changes. App store releases for native changes. We structure code to maximize what can be updated without a full release cycle, because waiting for app store review isn't always an option.

Updates and Distribution are Part of The Architecture

Over-the-air updates for JavaScript changes. App store releases for native changes. We structure code to maximize what can be updated without a full release cycle, because waiting for app store review isn't always an option.

TypeScript—Non-Negotiable for Production Work

The type system catches errors that would otherwise surface as crashes on users' devices. Strict mode. Proper typing for navigation, for native modules, for platform-specific code paths.

Who We Work Well With

Clients focused on reaching iOS and Android users efficiently—not on using React Native for its own sake.

Also: clients who aren't sure whether React Native is right for them. We help with that assessment. What does your app need to do? How native does it need to feel? What's your team's expertise? What's your maintenance capacity? Sometimes the answer is React Native. Sometimes it's native development. Sometimes it's a web app. We'll tell you what we actually think.

What both types have in common: direct communication, realistic expectations about cross-platform tradeoffs, and treating our team as partners rather than vendors executing a spec.

Who We're Not For

If you're comparing agencies on hourly rate alone, we'll lose that spreadsheet every time. What we won't lose is months of your roadmap to performance problems, platform rejections, and "it works on Android but not iPhone" surprises.

If you've decided React Native is the answer before asking what the question is—and you're not open to hearing otherwise—we're probably not the right fit. We've seen too many projects struggle because the technology choice was made for the wrong reasons.

If you need an app with heavy 3D graphics, complex real-time audio processing, or deep integration with platform-specific hardware—React Native might not be the right tool, and we'll tell you that. We'd rather recommend native development and lose the engagement than build something that fights the framework for its entire lifecycle.

Compounding Trust

Founders, CTOs, and Procurement Officers choose WAYF.
Hundreds of 0 → 1 launches · Fortune 500 partnerships · Global public institution contracts

Founders, CTOs, and Procurement Officers choose WAYF. Hundreds of 0 → 1 launches · Fortune 500 partnerships · Global public institution contracts

Client spotlight

Client spotlight

Client spotlight

Client spotlight

Client spotlight

Client spotlight

Council of Europe Development Bank

Billions of Euros in capital deployed each year to support social cohesion.

A grid background image

Council of Europe Development Bank

Billions of Euros in capital deployed each year to support social cohesion.

A grid background image

Fortune 500:
Ingersoll Rand

Worldwide manufacturer and distributor of unrivalled compressed air solutions.

A grid background image

Fortune 500: Ingersoll Rand

Worldwide manufacturer and distributor of unrivalled compressed air solutions.

A grid background image

Let's talk

Let's talk

Have a React Native project—new app, existing codebase that needs help, or a decision about whether React Native is right for you in the first place?

Have a React Native project—new app, existing codebase that needs help, or a decision about whether React Native is right for you in the first place?