<- Technologies
/
Payload Development
A headless CMS that thinks like a developer. TypeScript-native, code-first, no black boxes.
Payload fits how we already work—React frontends, TypeScript everywhere, configuration as code. When we need a headless CMS that doesn't fight our stack, this is what we reach for.
What We Build
Headless backends for React and Next.js applications. Content platforms where developers need full control. E-commerce product catalogs. Multi-tenant SaaS with content management baked in. Applications where the CMS is part of the product, not bolted on.
We've built Payload backends for marketing sites and for complex applications where content management was one feature among many. We've used it as a standalone CMS and embedded it directly into Next.js applications.
What we build less of: projects where editors need a polished, opinionated admin experience out of the box, or where the development team isn't comfortable with code-first configuration. Payload rewards technical teams. If yours isn't, other options may serve you better.
Why Us
How We Work
Sometimes you have a team and a process—you need specialists who can plug in. We do that. Your tools, your preferences. We adapt.
But often you need someone to own the process end-to-end. When we lead, we actually lead: two-week sprints, weekly syncs, decisions documented. We surface risks before they're problems. You get a team accountable for outcomes, not just output.
What stays constant: direct communication, no surprises, honest feedback. We'd rather have a hard conversation early than a failed project late.
What We See Go Wrong
The most common pattern: teams choose Payload because it's developer-friendly, then forget that editors still need to use it. The admin UI is capable but requires thoughtful configuration. Neglect that, and content teams struggle.
We also see teams underestimate the code-first tradeoff. Payload's power comes from configuration as code. If your team wants to click through a GUI to add fields, or if non-developers need to modify content models, that's friction.
Another pattern: treating Payload like a traditional CMS instead of leveraging its flexibility. It can be embedded in your application, share your authentication, run in the same deployment. Teams that deploy it as a separate service when they don't need to add complexity they could avoid.
Technical Approach
Configuration as Code
Means version control, code review, and type safety for your content model. No clicking through admin panels hoping you remember what changed. Schema changes go through the same process as application code.
Next.js integration is Native
Payload can run embedded in your Next.js application—same deployment, same authentication, no separate service to manage. We use this when it simplifies architecture and deploy separately when it doesn't.
Self-Hosted by Default
Your data stays on your infrastructure. No vendor lock-in, no usage-based pricing surprises, no third-party dependency for your content.
Who We Work Well With
Clients with technical teams who want control over their content infrastructure. Who see the CMS as part of the application, not a separate concern.
Also: clients building products where content management is a feature—SaaS platforms, multi-tenant applications, anything where "just use a hosted CMS" doesn't fit.
What both types have in common: comfort with code-first tools, realistic expectations, and treating our team as partners.
Who We're Not For
If you're comparing on hourly rate alone, we'll lose that spreadsheet. What we won't lose is months to content architecture that doesn't fit your application.
If your content team needs a polished, GUI-driven experience and your development team isn't going to invest in customizing the admin—Payload may not be the right fit. We'll tell you that.
If you want a hosted solution with no infrastructure responsibility—Payload Cloud exists, but other headless CMS options might suit you better. We'll help you evaluate honestly.



